2025 Chery Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate vs. Mazda CX-3 Sport: Budget SUV Battle
The compact SUV market is heating up, and Chery’s 2025 Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate is positioning itself as a strong contender against established rivals, including the Mazda CX-3 Sport. With competitive pricing and a feature-packed offering, the Tiggo 4 Pro aims to disrupt the segment, while the CX-3 continues to appeal with Mazda’s reputation for reliability, refinement, and driving experience.
Here’s a detailed comparison between the two vehicles across key categories to help you decide which one is right for you.
Pricing: Chery Wins the Value War
The Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate starts at an impressive $26,990 drive-away, undercutting the CX-3 Sport’s $29,990 price tag by $3000. This substantial price gap becomes even more significant when you consider Chery’s extensive list of standard features, often found only in higher trims of competing models.
- Chery Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate: $26,990 drive-away
- Mazda CX-3 Sport: $29,990 drive-away
With similar price points to entry-level models like the MG ZS and Kia Stonic, the Tiggo 4 Pro positions itself as a value champion in the budget SUV segment.
Engine and Efficiency: A Trade-Off Between Power and Economy
While both vehicles feature four-cylinder engines, their powertrains reflect different philosophies. The Tiggo 4 Pro uses a turbocharged 1.5L engine with a CVT, delivering strong torque for urban driving. In contrast, the CX-3 relies on a naturally aspirated 2.0L engine paired with a smooth six-speed automatic, emphasizing efficiency over outright grunt.
| Specification | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro | Mazda CX-3 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.5L turbo 4cyl | 2.0L 4cyl |
| Power | 108kW | 110kW |
| Torque | 210Nm | 195Nm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-speed automatic |
| Fuel Economy (Claimed) | 7.3L/100km | 6.3L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51L | 48L |
While the Tiggo 4 Pro offers better low-end torque, the CX-3 is more fuel-efficient, making it ideal for those prioritizing economy. The Mazda also produces fewer CO2 emissions, adhering to stricter Euro 5 standards compared to Chery’s Euro 6b compliance.
Dimensions and Practicality: Chery Offers More Space
The Tiggo 4 Pro outshines the CX-3 in size, boasting more generous proportions that translate into greater interior room and practicality.
| Dimensions | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro | Mazda CX-3 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4351mm | 4275mm |
| Width | 1831mm | 1765mm |
| Height | 1662mm | 1535mm |
| Wheelbase | 2610mm | 2570mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | 155mm |
| Boot Capacity | 380L/838L | 264L/1174L |
The Tiggo 4 Pro’s larger footprint provides more cabin space and a larger standard boot (380L vs. 264L). However, the CX-3 compensates with greater cargo capacity when rear seats are folded, making it a better option for those who frequently transport bulky items.
Interior and Features: Chery Brings Luxury to the Budget Segment
Inside, the Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate impresses with its upscale touches, while the CX-3 maintains its minimalist, driver-focused layout.
| Feature | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro | Mazda CX-3 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Upholstery | Leatherette | Cloth |
| Front Seats | Heated, power-adjustable | Manually adjustable |
| Climate Control | Dual-zone | Standard air-conditioning |
| Infotainment Screen | 10.25-inch touchscreen | 8.0-inch screen |
| Instrument Cluster | 10.25-inch digital | Dual LCD with analogue |
| Smartphone Mirroring | Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto | Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto |
The Tiggo 4 Pro offers features like heated, power-adjustable seats and dual-zone climate control, which are absent in the base CX-3 Sport. Additionally, its larger 10.25-inch infotainment screen and fully digital instrument cluster outshine the CX-3’s more dated tech setup.
Safety: Chery Outshines on Tech
Neither SUV has a current ANCAP safety rating, though the Tiggo 4 Pro boasts a more extensive suite of active safety features.
| Safety Feature | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro | Mazda CX-3 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Airbags | 7 | 6 |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Lane-Keep Assist | Yes | No |
| Traffic Sign Recognition | Yes | No |
| Surround-View Camera | Yes | No |
| Blind-Spot Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
Chery’s advanced safety systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keep assist, and a surround-view camera, give it an edge in this category. The CX-3 offers basic features like autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and blind-spot monitoring but lacks the cutting-edge tech found in the Tiggo 4 Pro.
Warranty and Running Costs: Chery Provides Better Coverage
Chery edges ahead with a longer warranty and extended roadside assistance, though Mazda offers predictable servicing intervals and costs.
| Running Costs | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro | Mazda CX-3 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Warranty | 7 years, unlimited km | 5 years, unlimited km |
| Roadside Assistance | 7 years (service activated) | 5 years (service activated) |
| Service Interval | TBC | 12 months or 15,000km |
| Avg. Service Cost | TBC | $440 per year (first 5 years) |
The Tiggo 4 Pro’s longer warranty provides peace of mind, but potential buyers should watch for the yet-to-be-announced servicing costs.
Verdict: Which SUV Should You Buy?
Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate and Mazda CX-3 Sport have their strengths, but they cater to slightly different audiences:
- Chery Tiggo 4 Pro Ultimate: Best for buyers who prioritize value, advanced features, and interior space. Its extensive tech and safety suite make it a compelling option for budget-conscious families.
- Mazda CX-3 Sport: Ideal for those seeking a proven, fuel-efficient, and reliable small SUV with a strong resale value.
The Tiggo 4 Pro represents incredible value, especially for those willing to take a chance on a newer brand, while the CX-3 appeals to traditionalists who value Mazda’s well-established reputation.
Which would you choose? Let us know!
